Mergers and Acquisitions vs Lead Generation: The Battle for AUM Growth

For years, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have been the go-to strategy for firms looking to grow their assets under management (AUM). Consolidators have swept through the UK financial advice sector, acquiring businesses in pursuit of scale. And on the surface, the logic seems sound: buy an advisory firm, inherit its client base, and drive-up AUM in one fell swoop.

Yet, the reality is far more complex. The industry has seen a surge in M&A activity, with recent reports suggesting that 90% of independent financial advisers expect consolidation to accelerate in the coming years. The driving forces are well understood mounting regulatory burdens, rising operational costs, and the lure of efficiencies through economies of scale. But while acquisitions can deliver immediate AUM growth, they also come with significant risk.

When a firm buys a book of clients, it is, in many ways, making a leap of faith. Even the most robust due diligence process cannot guarantee long-term client retention. Individuals who built relationships with their original adviser may not seamlessly transition to new ownership. The suitability of historical advice, an ever-present compliance concern remains an unknown until issues arise. And, of course, there’s the financial burden: acquiring firms often require significant upfront capital, with an uncertain return horizon.

This begs the question: is there an alternative?

A lesser discussed but increasingly compelling approach to AUM growth is lead generation. While often dismissed as a secondary strategy or a volume-based marketing play, when executed correctly, lead generation can be a highly effective means of client acquisition, one that delivers measurable returns and avoids many of the pitfalls of M&A.

Take, for example, the commercial reality of acquiring £50 million in AUM through lead generation rather than acquisition. If an adviser were to secure high-quality leads at a cost of £1,000 per lead, with a conversion rate of 33%, the cost per acquired client would sit at just over £3,000. If the average assets per client reached £250,000, the total cost of securing £50 million in AUM would be in the region of £606,000.

At first glance, this is a substantial investment. But the economics shift dramatically when factoring in the revenue generated. With an initial advice fee of 2%, the firm would earn £1 million in fees at the point of onboarding. That means, even after covering the entire cost of client acquisition, the adviser is left with a net gain of nearly £400,000. Beyond this, ongoing advice fees of 0.6% would generate an additional £300,000 per year, equating to £1.5 million over five years, without any further expenditure on lead acquisition.

Now, let’s compare this to the M&A route under the same financial assumptions. If a firm were to acquire an advice business with £50 million in AUM, it would typically pay a multiple of circa four times the annual ongoing advice income. With an ongoing fee of 0.6%, that business would generate £300,000 per year, meaning the purchase price would be approximately £1.2 million.

This immediately presents a stark contrast. While the lead generation model requires an investment of £606,000 (which is offset by £1 million in immediate initial advice fees), an acquisition demands at least double the capital, without the benefit of an upfront income boost. The acquired firm would generate the same £1.5 million in ongoing fees over five years, but unlike lead generation, the return on investment is delayed. The acquirer must first recoup the £1.2 million purchase cost before turning a profit.

Perhaps most importantly, the M&A route comes with no guarantees. While a firm may pay for an established client base, there is always attrition, some clients may leave, reducing the actual value of the acquired assets. By contrast, lead generation builds relationships from the outset. These are clients who have actively chosen the adviser, rather than being transferred as part of a deal, and their engagement levels are likely to be significantly higher as a result.

For years, lead generation has been viewed in narrow terms, framed as a tool for generating volume rather than genuine, long-term AUM growth. But when analysed through a commercial lens, the model stands up to scrutiny. It provides a structured, predictable route to building an asset that retains value, while avoiding the substantial risks inherent in the M&A process.

For advisers looking to scale, the choice between acquisition and lead generation is not a binary one. But in an industry where M&A has long been the dominant force, it is time for lead generation to be recognised not just as a source of leads but as a legitimate, scalable, and financially robust client acquisition strategy.

Are you looking to grow your AUM without the risks of acquisition? At Inzuzo, we can help. Get in touch with our team to find out more:

Contact